I am once again baffled by the ignorance and autopilot tendency we have demonstrated in our culture in recent decades. This overreliance on "the machine" to diagnose and give weight to ideas, rather than thinking it through ourselves. I want to reflect on the quote by Postman regarding this issue:
"One might even say that an intelligence test is a tale told by an expert, signifiying nothing." We all know that there is more to a person's intelligence than what a test can possible identify or reflect, yet, we often allow these things to carry more weight than they should in our views or understanding of something. Ex. Political polls- Numbers mean everything, despite their limitations to reflect the views of the voters polled (machine = reliable person = untrustworthy)
The examples of the medical arena in the U.S. versus other countries in the use of tests and surgeries to identify the threat and conquer, much like we do in other areas of society has left us creating more problems as we "solve" others. The author stated that the doctors are no longer using technology, but technology is using them.
I am reminded of the “autopilot” (reflected on in my post on chapters 3 and 4) that has become so prevelant in our students when they access
information online. We have to be the regulators training them with
discernment, not simply limiting the info they access. “Teaching
how to fish”, rather than simply “feeding them” idea. In reference to "A Whole New Mind", we need to pay more attention to the story behind the data and not assume that because information came from a machine that it is "truth" in itself with no other factors involved. It is encouraging to find that medical schools, as well as other fields of study, are looking at the value of the story being the stats. Hopefully, we are learning a little something, as a culture, about not just the benefits, but the limitations of the machines we use.